To the editor:

New Chatham Town Board members Abi Mesick and Vance Pitkin, and Supervisor Donal Collins wasted no time showing us that their platform of transparency and inclusion was just campaign talk.

Without consulting the other two board members, posting a notice on the Town website or the newspaper to solicit applications — and without interviewing those who had already submitted applications — they made their appointments to the new Comprehensive Plan Update Review Committee.

Sworn in Jan. 1, by Jan. 2 it was a done deal — in secret, and very likely in violation of the NYS Open Meetings Law created to protect citizens from back-door dealing like this.

So who’d they pick? A pay-to-play team:

Councilwoman Abi Mesick: Ran against the existing comp plan and proposed zoning; promised to represent “the WHOLE town’ if elected. A promise already broken.

Co-Chair Jeanne Bowerman: Campaign donor; strongly against regulation of STRs, owner of an STR in Canaan, and several additional properties slated to become STRs.

Co-Chair Cindy Buckley: Campaign Donor

Jeff Cox: Campaign supporter

Dave Everett: Campaign worker

Tim Mackerer: Campaign Donor

Donna Staron: Campaign Donor

Advised that the Open Meetings Law prohibited behind-the-scenes activities such as the formation of this committee, Supervisor Collins said that they “did it before they were sworn in so it was OK.”

The questionable ethics and legality of this action is disturbing. They promised better government but this isn’t it.

Elizabeth DiPalma

Chatham

Johnson Newspapers 7.1

Tags

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.